For the second straight year hundreds of people in Bloomfield are sore that while their side prevailed overwhelmingly in a referendum on the town budget (according to the Hartford Courant, the vote was 1,959 against the budget to 305 for it), the budget again has been deemed approved, this time with a 3% tax increase. Some property owners will end up facing a tax increase approaching 11% because the town is still implementing updated property valuations, which have soared with inflation.

Bloomfield Mayor Anthony Harrington told the Courant... that the budget was a lean as it could be...and asked “Where would the budget reductions come from?"
Yes, Bloomfield’s budget could have been reduced. For the biggest single expense in government in Connecticut is personnel, and with laws requiring unionization of state and municipal government employees, binding arbitration of their union contracts... state government has essentially put the costs of government personnel beyond economizing.
All together these laws result in compensation for government employees that is far more generous than what is received by private-sector employees in comparable jobs. That is what state and municipal elected and budget officials are hinting at when they shrug and say their budgeting options are limited by “fixed costs.”
The solution is obvious but always unspoken: To freeze or reduce taxes, you have to unfix the “fixed costs.”
Those costs weren’t fixed by God but by legislators and governors who long have been subservient to a particular special interest — a special interest that has come to control an entire political party, a special interest that the other major party is usually too timid to challenge.











