Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts tagged as “Column of the Day”

Governor has been a big ally of towns; except on coronavirus relief funding

Connecticut towns and cities still have no idea if or how the state plans to share CARES Act funds with communities. Specifically, the federal stimulus package contained a Coronavirus Relief Fund, which is for state and local government expenditures regarding the pandemic. Connecticut received $1.38 billion from the fund. The law left it up to states to decide if and how much financial aid to provide to municipalities with populations under 500,000.

Many states are entering into agreements to share funds with their towns and cities. So far, not Connecticut, a state containing three of the hardest hit areas in the country (Fairfield, New Haven and Hartford counties).

Just look to our neighbor, Massachusetts. Aside from large local governments — Boston and Plymouth County, where funds have been sent directly — Massachusetts is setting aside 25% of its Coronavirus funds for its towns and cities.


Read in CT Mirror


Read and comment here on The Red Line

The Real Scorecard on Gov. Lamont’s C-19 Performance

Gov. Ned Lamont is winning solid approval ratings from a large majority of the state’s citizens for his handling of the COVID-19 crisis. You have to like the no-nonsense, non-sensational way he has been handling this awful situation. What could be harder than having to balance human lives saved against jobs lost and economic security for hundreds of thousands of our fellow citizens?

But what does the data say about how Connecticut is doing compared to other states? Isn’t that a very real scorecard on performance we should be looking at to judge the effectiveness of our political leaders and our collective citizen responses?

The data are not so flattering — they are decidedly grim.

According to Kaiser Family Foundation data as of May 22, our state ranks third in COVID deaths per million of population (1,031), behind only New York at 1,492 and New Jersey at 1,248. The national average is “only” 296 COVID deaths per million; our neighbor Rhode Island is at 564.

How could we be so far off the national mark? Are our death rates somehow an inevitable consequence of having New York as a neighbor?

A big part of the puzzle could be that we have not focused on the heart of the problem in Connecticut. The state’s own data reports that about 71 percent of our COVID-related deaths have been from residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. By contrast, 51 to 53 percent of COVID deaths are from nursing home residents nationwide. If you add in the COVID deaths in Connecticut’s prisons, the percent of our death toll from “confined populations” is over 76 percent.

It’s hard to argue that our high death rates in these vulnerable but confined populations is somehow the result of proximity or contagion from New York.

Read in Hartford Courant

Read and comment here on The Red Line

Make teens’ murder trials public, Dalio ‘education’ farce too

Obsessed with the virus epidemic, Connecticut might not have noticed two deaths last week from a different cause -- the murder of two women in their home in Windsor. There is little chance that Connecticut will notice those murders any time soon, for while police have charged two 17-year-olds with the crime, the young men have not been officially identified and their prosecution will be secret, as in totalitarian China.

Ever since 1818 Connecticut's Constitution has declared unambiguously, "All courts shall be open." But last year the General Assembly and Governor Lamont enacted the Chinese system on the premise that secrecy would be better for juveniles charged not just with lesser offenses like car theft but also with murder and rape, lest juveniles so charged risk getting bad reputations.

* * *

Restoring accountability in state government should not stop with repeal of the secret trials law. The legislature also should take note of the farce that has become the Partnership for Connecticut, the agency created by statute last year at the request of Governor Lamont's friend, the billionaire Ray Dalio, to mix government money with the billionaire's and spend it in the name of improving the education of disadvantaged students. Also at Dalio's request, the partnership was exempted from state accountability and ethics laws.


Read in Journal Inquirer


Read and comment here on The Red Line

The Lockdown Skeptic They Couldn’t Silence

Targeted for censorship in March, Aaron Ginn is becoming an influential voice in cities, states and Washington

Does a pandemic demand the strong medicine of censorship? Social-media companies seem to think so. They’re taking steps to control speech in the name of combating the spread of medical misinformation. Facebook employs “fact checkers” to review posts, makes those that don’t pass their test harder to find, and directs users to purportedly reliable sources like the World Health Organization. YouTube has taken down videos it deems inconsistent with science. Twitter plans to add warning labels to tweets that don’t pass muster with “subject-matter experts, such as public health authorities.”

Aaron Ginn’s story is a cautionary tale that even well-intended censorship can overreach, suppressing the search for truth. Mr. Ginn, 32, is the Silicon Valley technologist who posted an essay on March 20 titled “Evidence over hysteria—COVID-19” on the Medium website. Citing academic research and government data, Mr. Ginn argued that public-health experts were focusing too much on “flattening the curve . . . while ignoring the economic shock to our system” of shuttering businesses and schools and ordering Americans to stay home.

“When 13% of Americans believe they are currently infected with COVID-19 (mathematically impossible),” he wrote, “full-on panic is blocking our ability to think clearly and determine how to deploy our resources to stop this virus.” The message was well-timed—the day he posted it, Gov. Andrew Cuomo ordered “nonessential” New York businesses to close.

Mr. Ginn’s essay drew 2.6 million page views in 24 hours—and a barrage of liberal criticism. Carl T. Bergstrom, a University of Washington biologist, called it “Shakespeare run through google translate into Japanese, then translated back to English by someone who’d never heard of Shakespeare.” Then Medium took it down, saying it violated rules under a “risk analysis framework we use for ‘Controversial, Suspect and Extreme content.’ ”


Continue Reading in The Wall Street Journal

How to reopen society using medical science and logic

As of the first week of May, more than 66,000 Americans have died from the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that three to four weeks typically elapse before death, thousands more who are already infected will also succumb to the virus. That said, the direct toll from the infection has markedly declined throughout the United States, including the epicenter of New York. The curves have been flattened – the stated goal of the isolation has been accomplished – for both hospitalizations per day and deaths per day.

We now have an even greater urgency, due to the severe and single-minded policies already implemented. Treating COVID-19 “at all costs” is severely restricting other medical care and instilling fear in the public, creating a massive health disaster, separate from a potential world poverty crisis with almost incalculable consequences.


Read in The Hill


Read and comment here on The Red Line

The Economic Lockdown Catastrophe

The worst jobs report in history shows why the economy must reopen.

When we wrote on March 19 about “Rethinking the Coronavirus Shutdown,” the reaction in elite media quarters was horror and denunciation. Well, after Friday’s horrific jobs report, how do you like the shutdown now? The people who said we have to sacrifice the economy to crush the virus have succeeded in the former even as the virus will be with us for many more months or longer.

Unemployment in April soared to 14.7%—the highest rate since the government started keeping records in 1948—while employers shed 20.5 million more jobs after losing 870,000 in March. The labor-market bleeding is even worse than those numbers suggest since 6.4 million workers left the workforce.


Read in The Wall Street Journal

COVID-19 and the underbrush theory. Why Smokey Bear is the problem

The “Underbrush Theory,” helps to explain what has happened.

The Underbrush Theory states that there is a natural rate of attrition (a.k.a., deaths) for any population, and reducing deaths for several years below this natural rate (e.g., perhaps because of lucky guesses on the right flu vaccine, more flu vaccinations, improving sanitation, better public health programs, better medical care, new drug discoveries, etc.), just means Mother Nature’s bill is inevitably going to be higher in some subsequent year when she throws a novel flu cocktail at us.

It’s like Smokey Bear preventing forest fires for so long that the underbrush accumulates to feed what inevitably becomes a much bigger, more destructive fire in some future year (think California and Australia). We must all remember that old age is still lethal — no one is getting out of here alive. The only question is what the proximate cause of death will be. Flu-related deaths are and always have been the default option for many old people.

Read in CT Mirror


Read and comment here on The Red Line

Connecticut state employees on track for $135 million raise as other states delay wage increases

Democratic governors in New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia are temporarily suspending raises for state employees or freezing pay until they can better understand the fiscal impact of the pandemic, but, thus far, Connecticut state employees are still scheduled to receive a second pay increase, projected to cost taxpayers $353 million.

The second round of wage increases is set for July 1, the start of the 2021 fiscal year, and is comprised of a 3.5 percent general wage increase, combined with an annual step increase of 2 percent.

Paragraph


Read at Yankee Institute


Read here on The Red Line

COVID-19 Hysteria Reigns Supreme – Meanwhile Many More Die Regularly of Other Causes Without Any Talk of Shutdowns

As you know, the coronavirus—if you catch it, and get very sick—is a terrible thing to go through and you may even die. The virus and the fear of it are sorely testing our medical capacity in some places... The heroic efforts and sacrifice of many doctors, nurses, and volunteer civilians are all notable and praiseworthy. Millions of Americans are pulling together. We all know this.

Did you know the chances of recovery from the coronavirus are about 98%—if you catch it? Did you know this?... We are getting conditioned to a lot of panic because of the wide range of speculation about other numbers we accept as our new fright-inducing reality, an increasingly confusing and frenzied set of numbers. And the normalization of our panic is having dire consequences and augurs for even worse.

Our officials and media have warned us of 2 million deaths in the United States. Then 200,000 deaths. Then 100,000 to 240,000. This needs to stop. There have been a total of 68,000 coronavirus deaths worldwide. And we are told we will see, just in America, three to four times that number. Does that even pass the plausibility test?

Continue Reading:

Read in Real Clear Politics


Read and comment here on The Red Line

Shutdown is killing the economy — and is also no good for our health

President Trump has announced that he is aiming toward Easter Sunday to start getting the economy up and running again. This has triggered heavy opposition. There is a serious debate about how much destruction to the economy we are willing to tolerate to save lives from the coronavirus. It seems cold hearted, even cruel, to assess the costs versus the risks of policy actions when lives are at stake.

But guess what? Government officials have to make these decisions all the time. If the only goal of government is to minimize deaths, then the first step would be to prohibit people from driving cars. We do not do that because we have decided as a society that benefits for 320 million Americans of having reliable transportation outweigh deaths on the highway.

This is also why President Trump, along with governors and mayors across the country, need to acknowledge that the lockdown of the economy also carries health risks and unintended consequences. You cannot crush the economy without having a significant degree of human misery and even deaths, not counting the loss in dollars of wealth and income.

A study by the National Survey of Drug Use and Health found the rate of drug addiction could be as much double for those who are unemployed as for those who are employed full time.


Read in The Hill

Read and comment here on The Red Line

A study by the National Survey of Drug Use and Health found the rate of drug addiction could be as much double for those who are unemployed as for those who are employed full time.


Read in The Hill

Read and comment here on The Red Line